Recall bias refers to the systematic difference in the ability of participant groups to accurately recall information. Observational studies that rely on self-reporting of past behaviors or events are particularly prone to this type of bias.
Example: Recall bias
Parents whose children have developed asthma are likely to be quite concerned about what may have contributed to their child’s condition.
As a result, if asked by a researcher, these parents are more likely to recall relevant details, such as changes in their children’s breathing when active or resting, than parents of children without any health issues.
They’ve also already associated possible triggers, such as certain foods, environments, or other allergens, with their child’s asthma. This difference in the ability to recall information results in recall bias.
Recall bias threatens the internal validity and credibility of studies using self-reported data.
Recall bias is a type of research bias. It can occur whenever an attempt is made to collect data retrospectively, or after the event has already happened.
Recall bias is a common problem in research studies that rely on self-reporting, such as case-control, cross-sectional, and retrospective cohort studies. The time that elapses between the interview or survey and the phenomenon under study can influence participants’ recollections.
Example: Recall bias in case-control studies
Case-control studies are particularly susceptible to recall bias. The goal of these studies is to identify factors that may contribute to a medical condition by comparing data from a case group against a control group.
However, individuals with a specific disease (the case group) have likely already gone over their life history in an attempt to understand why they became ill. Meanwhile, individuals in the unaffected control group are less likely to have done so. This increases the chances of recall bias.
As a result, the case group is more likely to assign significance to past events. They may be able to recall a greater number of potential risk factors than the control group, even if these events or factors didn’t necessarily contribute to their current condition or disease.
This can lead researchers to exaggerate the correlation between a potential risk factor and a disease.
Recall bias is caused by an inaccurate or incomplete recollection of events by study participants. Research shows that remarkable or infrequent events, such as buying a house, are more memorable for longer periods of time than everyday events, such as driving to work.
In general, the following conditions increase the chances of recall bias in studies using self-reported data:
It is important to keep in mind that recall bias is not the same as forgetfulness. If the extent of forgetfulness regarding past events is equal in the case and control groups, recall bias will not occur. If one group remembers previous events or experiences more accurately than the other, then recall bias is at play.
Recall bias can cause researchers to draw false conclusions regarding the causes of an event, disease, or condition.
Example: Assigning more significance to past events
Prior to discovering that Down syndrome was caused by genetics, researchers spent a long time trying to find out what caused it.
In the studies conducted on the subject, women who gave birth to children with Down syndrome reported more traumatic events during their pregnancy than mothers of children without Down syndrome. Due to that, researchers concluded that emotional distress played a role in the chance of giving birth to a baby with the syndrome.
However, later research indicated that genetic factors were the cause, disproving the initial conclusions.
Often, the experience of being studied encourages individuals to search through their memories in an effort to explain what happened. In doing so, they may assign more significance to certain events. This often leads to recall bias.
Here, women who had given birth to children with Down syndrome displayed a tendency to over-report ordinary events as traumatic. As a result, researchers wrongly concluded that there was an association between emotional distress during pregnancy and Down syndrome. Recall bias had misled researchers.
If your research involves asking participants to self-report, there are steps you can take to prevent or minimize recall bias: