
Ingroup bias is the tendency to favor one’s own group over other groups. Ingroup bias affects our perception of (and behavior towards) others, giving preferential treatment to the members of our own group while excluding other groups.
Example: Ingroup bias
You are stuck in traffic, trying to change lanes and exit the highway. A car approaches and tries to cut you off. You are annoyed until you notice the other car has a bumper sticker of your favorite sports team. You give them a friendly nod and let them pass.
As a result, we tend to look down on people we don’t consider members of our group, even when we know nothing about them. Due to this, ingroup bias can lead to prejudice and discrimination.
Ingroup bias (also called ingroup favoritism) is a type of cognitive bias that causes us to categorize people depending on whether we share a common group identification with them. According to ingroup bias, people either belong to our ingroup (i.e., the same group as us) or an outgroup (i.e., a different group).
Group identification can stem from any characteristic that creates a sense of collective identity among people. This can range from sports team affiliation to nationality. This group identification can be temporary, such as an improv comedy troupe at college, or more permanent, such as religious beliefs. Therefore, one can experience ingroup bias in any situation where an individual’s group identity is prominent, like a workplace, school, or sports stadium.
Regardless of the nature of the group, we tend to like our ingroup members and dislike outgroup members.This feeling is accentuated when individuals feel that the value of their ingroup is being threatened.
Ingroup bias causes us to favor our own ingroup members, treat them differently, and be more willing to share resources with them. For example, we are happy to recommend someone from our ingroup for a job. Relatedly, we think of outgroup members as inferior, and we don’t wish to share resources with them (called outgroup bias).
We can observe this tendency at a larger scale among nations that are not willing to cooperate and share limited resources, such as water. When experienced in larger groups like countries or ethnicities, ingroup bias is referred to as ethnocentrism.
Ingroup bias is caused by several factors. A number of theories can help explain why ingroup bias occurs:
Note
Although ingroup bias is a fundamental aspect of how we perceive the world, there are some cases in which it doesn’t occur:
Ingroup bias cuts across social groups, settings, and cultures. It can be observed in children as young as three years old. Ingroup bias impacts our behaviors and attitudes in various ways. For example, it can cause us to:
Most importantly, positive behaviors from the ingroup and negative behaviors from the outgroup are attributed to stable group characteristics. On the other hand, negative behaviors from the ingroup and positive behaviors from the outgroup are seen as an exception.These are more likely to be attributed to temporary situational factors or the behaviors of specific individuals.
Perceiving ingroups and outgroups in this way is problematic. In its simplest form, ingroup bias can result in an “us vs. them” mentality. This can cause us to associate only with people who are similar to us and distance ourselves from those who are different. However, taking it to its extreme, ingroup bias can have serious consequences resulting in discrimination, xenophobia, and racism.
Ingroup bias suggests that group membership of both the witness and the perpetrator of a crime can have a significant impact on witness testimony.
Example: Ingroup bias and criminal behavior
In one study conducted in Sweden, researchers examined how the ingroup/outgroup status of a perpetrator of a violent crime might influence an eyewitness’s evaluation of the crime. Immigrant and Swedish students saw a film showing a simulated robbery, with an immigrant or a Swede as the perpetrator.
The results were quite interesting: both groups evaluated an ethnically dissimilar perpetrator as more culpable than an ethnically similar perpetrator. In other words, “witnesses” found the crime more blameworthy when the perpetrator belonged to an outgroup.
This finding shows that ingroup bias does not only influence whom we choose to socialize with, but it can also have more serious consequences. The potential effect of ingroup/outgroup membership should be considered when witness testimonies are evaluated in court proceedings.