
Hindsight bias is the tendency to perceive past events as more predictable than they actually were. Due to this, people think their judgment is better than it is. This can lead them to take unnecessary risks or judge others too harshly.
Example: Hindsight bias
Football fans often criticize or question the actions of players or coaches in what is known as “Monday morning quarterbacking.” They often claim they knew the result before the game was over and that the outcome was easily preventable. This is particularly the case after a loss.
However, it is easy to pass judgment from a position of hindsight and to recognize bad decisions after the fact. When you know the result, you know what worked and what didn’t work during the game. Hindsight bias is the reason behind the “Monday morning quarterback” phenomenon.
Because people feel that they “knew it all along,” they overestimate their ability to foresee the outcome of future events, such as medical errors, sport scores, or election results.
Hindsight bias is a type of cognitive bias that causes people to convince themselves that a past event was predictable or inevitable. After an event, people often believe they knew the outcome of the event before it actually happened.
In reality, people usually consider many different scenarios of what might happen in the future, but there’s no way to be certain which one of them will ultimately materialize. Regardless of which scenario plays out, people become convinced that “they saw it coming.”
Hindsight bias is more likely to occur when the outcome of an event is negative rather than positive. This is consistent with the general tendency people have to pay more attention to negative outcomes of events, known as negativity bias.
Hindsight bias, for instance, might cause us to think that we “knew” a couple in our social circle would break up. This is because our current knowledge allows us to easily re-interpret any past disagreements or questionable behavior as a sign of trouble.
Hindsight bias occurs as a result of our effort to make sense of an outcome. During this process, we essentially “rewrite the story,” focusing on certain factors and disregarding others.
Three different processes are involved in hindsight bias (these can occur independently or together):
Hindsight bias causes people to think that certain (negative) outcomes were far more predictable and avoidable than they were in reality. This can have both negative and positive consequences.
Entrepreneurs who don’t see their plans succeed often exhibit hindsight bias.
Example: Hindsight bias and startup failure
Studies have shown that entrepreneurs are highly susceptible to hindsight bias. In one study, researchers surveyed 705 entrepreneurs from failed startups. Before the failure, 77.3% of entrepreneurs believed their startup would grow into a successful business. However, after the startup failed, only 58% said they had originally believed their startup would be a success.
In other words, entrepreneurs tend to downplay their initial optimism and overestimate their ability to foresee the future. This systematic distortion of the past has important implications for future ventures. Due to hindsight bias, entrepreneurs are at risk of overestimating their chances of success when launching their next startup
In medical malpractice lawsuits, jurors need to factor in hindsight bias when deciding whether a doctor did the best they could with the knowledge they had at the time.
Example: Hindsight bias and medical errors
During a routine physical examination, a 68-year-old man undergoes a chest x-ray in a local community hospital. The radiologist who looks at the x-rays finds nothing out of the ordinary.
The man doesn’t visit his physician again until 4 years later, when he begins experiencing a cough, chest discomfort, and weight loss. The new x-ray shows a tumor which needs urgent treatment. The man decides to sue the first radiologist, who missed the tumor in the initial x-ray.
In court, the second radiologist argues that the first radiologist should have been able to see the tumor in the earlier x-ray.
The radiologist’s attorney, on the other hand, defends his client by claiming that the other radiologist only spotted the cancer because they already knew what to look for. In other words, the attorney claimed that hindsight bias was at play, and it was unreasonable to expect that the first radiologist should have known what was only knowable from an x-ray that came later.
Hindsight bias is part of human nature, but there are steps you can take to reduce it: