Ad populum fallacy refers to a claim that something is true simply because that’s what a large number of people believe. In other words, if many people believe something to be true, then it must be true.
Ad populum fallacy example
You’re at a bookstore browsing for books with a friend. Although you are an avid sci-fi reader, your friend picks up a memoir and tells you that you should read the book because it’s a bestseller.
This type of argument is often used when there is no real evidence to back up a certain claim. Ad populum fallacy (also called bandwagon fallacy, appeal to numbers, or appeal to popularity) can be found in advertisements, political speeches, and everyday discussions.
What is ad populum fallacy?
An ad populum fallacy occurs when we use an “argumentum ad populum” (Latin for “argument to the people”), meaning that we make an appeal to what most people think, like, or believe, instead of justifying our position with evidence.
When we are trying to persuade someone about our ideas, preferences, or beliefs, it is often tempting to simply claim that the majority of the people agree with us. Words that imply that many people believe, do, or buy something (such as “the majority,” “lots,” or “most”) are typical to this fallacy.
However, this type of argument is fallacious. Even if the claim is true, popularity alone is not a sufficient reason to accept it as such. The fact that most people may be in favor of the claim is not an adequate substitute for actual evidence (for example, for centuries people believed that the earth was the center of the solar system, but this was ultimately proved to be false).
Ad populum fallacy is a logical fallacy. More specifically, it is an informal fallacy of relevance because no relevant reasons are given to support the claim. In the example above, the premise (i.e., the fact that the book is a bestseller) is not sufficient evidence to accept the conclusion (i.e., you should read it). In logic, the approval of the majority alone cannot substitute the justification for a claim.
When is an ad populum argument legitimate?
It is important to remember that ad populum arguments are not always fallacious. When the belief of the majority is relevant and serves as acceptable evidence for what is true, an ad populum argument is perfectly legitimate.
This is the case when it comes to matters decided by a majority (e.g., the definition of words, jury verdicts, or the outcome of a political election). In such cases, the belief of the majority can be a reasonable basis for accepting the claim. For example, if a friend insists that “magnanimous” means “tall,” and you reply that “magnanimous” means “forgiving” because the majority of dictionaries say so, your argument is not fallacious.
What are different types of ad populum fallacy?
There are three main variations of the ad populum fallacy:
Bandwagon fallacy
Snob appeal
Appeal to tradition
Bandwagon fallacy
Bandwagon fallacy (or bandwagon appeal) is the main form of the ad populum fallacy and occurs when someone argues that a belief or action is correct because the majority of people support it. Such arguments take advantage of the “bandwagon effect,” a cognitive bias that causes people to adopt the behaviors or opinions of others due to a desire to fit in and be liked.
Bandwagon fallacy example
“Everyone is getting the new smartphone as soon as it comes out this weekend. You should get it too.”
Here, the argument is “everyone is doing it, and you should too.” However, just because a lot of people do something does not mean it’s right or good to do.
Snob appeal
In this variation, the arguer appeals to people’s desire to be part of an exclusive or elite group. Instead of asserting “everyone’s doing it,” the argument suggests “all the best people are doing it.” The snob appeal is often used in advertising.
Snob appeal example
“The new Mercedes Benz is crafted for connoisseurs who appreciate unparalleled refinement. Join the exclusive circle that savors automotive excellence.”
The implication here is that if you buy this particular car, you will become part of an elite segment of society.
Appeal to tradition
Appeal to tradition (or appeal to common practice) asserts that a premise must be true or right because people have always believed it or practiced it. Alternatively, it may assert that the premise has always worked in the past, so it will always work in the future. This line of thought conflates tradition with correctness without considering whether it is justified or relevant.
Appeal to tradition example
“We should keep using mercury-based thermometers because we have been using them for generations.”
Here, the argument makes an appeal to tradition to support the use of mercury-based thermometers and ignores the fact that there are modern alternatives that do not pose the health and environmental risks that mercury does.
Ad populum fallacy example
Ad populum fallacy is often used to defend habits, actions, or behaviors that are harmful to oneself or others simply because many or most people follow them.
Ad populum fallacy and smoking
“Smoking must be safe because millions of people have been doing it for years.”
This claim commits the ad populum fallacy by suggesting that the widespread popularity and lasting presence of smoking as a habit imply its safety. However, this argument is fallacious and disregards the overwhelming scientific evidence linking smoking to severe health risks such as lung cancer and heart disease.
Frequently asked questions about the ad populum fallacy
|
How does the ad populum fallacy work? The ad populum fallacy plays on our innate desire to fit in (known as “bandwagon effect”). If many people believe something, our common sense tells us that it must be true and we tend to accept it. However, in logic, the popularity of a proposition cannot serve as evidence of its truthfulness.
What is an example of ad populum fallacy in politics? The ad populum fallacy is common in politics. One example is the following viewpoint: “The majority of our countrymen think we should have military operations overseas; therefore, it’s the right thing to do.” This line of reasoning is fallacious, because popular acceptance of a belief or position does not amount to a justification of that belief. In other words, following the prevailing opinion without examining the underlying reasons is irrational.
What is the difference between ad populum fallacy and appeal to authority fallacy? Ad populum (or appeal to popularity) fallacy and appeal to authority fallacy are similar in that they both conflate the validity of a belief with its popular acceptance among a specific group. However there is a key difference between the two:
|
Nikolopoulou, K. (2023, November 13). What Is Ad Populum Fallacy? | Definition & Examples. Scribbr. Retrieved April 7, 2024, from https://www.scribbr.com/fallacies/ad-populum-fallacy/
McCraw, B. W. (2018). Appeal to the People. Bad Arguments, 112–114. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119165811.ch16
논문과 관련하여 도움이 필요한 경우 친절하게 상담하고 있으니 편한 마음으로, 전화, 홈페이지, 카톡, 톡톡 등을 통해 상담을 받아보세요~
대표번호 : 02-554-0805
고객센터 : 1899-0805
24시간카톡상담 : brainphd
이메일 : info5044@brainphd.co.kr
#Article #Research #Paper #논문컨설팅 #석사논문 #박사논문 #공학논문 #사회복지논문 #건축학논문 #서울대박사 #논문통계 #SPSS #SCI논문 #학위논문 #논문교정 #부산논문 #대전논문 #간호학논문 #경영학논문 #마케팅논문 #음악논문 #미술논문 #교육학논문 #심리학논문 #의학논문